ALG attorney Robert Hedrick has added to ALG’s attorney license expansion by taking and passing the July Hawaii Bar Exam.
Hedrick put it into perspective: “while this is the fourth bar exam that I have passed, it has been nearly 20 years since my last bar exam, and the difficult challenge of passing a bar exam is ever present, especially to those older attorneys such as myself.” Hedrick also advises: “A good bar exam review would be beneficial for a lot of experienced attorneys, as we often forget the fundamentals of law outside our practice areas.”
ALG attorneys are now licensed in California, Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii. ALG handles matters throughout the U.S., and we associate local counsel in other states when needed.
Last week was marred by two crashes of part 135 operators in Alaska – one minor and one tragic.
On February 5th, the first incident was lost of control during the take-off of a Cessna 208 in Hooper Bay. The aircraft was operated by Grant Aviation and there were no major injuries reported by the occupants.
On February 7th, a part 135 flight from Bethel to Kipnuk operated by Yute Commuter Service was reported missing. It was found later in the afternoon about 11 miles west of Tuntutuliak and about 35 miles into their 80 miles flight.
Rescue efforts were hampered by weather and the remoteness of the crash site but none of the five occupants survived the crash.
Kipnuk is a very small community and we mourn with the families of lost in this tragedy and the community as a whole.
A Sikorsky S-76 that was operated by Island Express Helicopters (the operators took down their website shortly after the crash) crashed this morning in Calabasas, California killing 9 people.
While there will be an FAA investigation, the abundance of evidence suggests that this was a CFIT (Controlled Flight Into Terrain) accident. A CFIT accident is most commonly results when an aircraft loses visual with the ground and horizon by entering a cloud. If the pilot does this near terrain, he will have little time to react as he nears a mountain. This type of accident can best be avoided by never operating in such marginal conditions.
The audio and flight path data provide evidence that this was a CFIT accident and conditions in which a commercial helicopter operator should not have been flying.
The helicopter held outside of VNY airspace for 15 minutes due to poor weather conditions. We hear examples of aircraft having to attempt multiple landings (go-around) due to the conditions.
The neighboring airports were reporting instrument conditions and helicopter requested a Special VFR transition through the VNY airspace. A Special VFR transition must be requested by the pilot and is indicative of very low weather conditions.
It is unlikely that the weather conditions changed to VFR as the pilot reported while leaving VNY airspace.
The So. Cal controller stated that the helicopter was too low for flight following shortly before the crash.
Finally, the last few seconds show the helicopter dramatically trying to gain altitude as it nears the crash site which indicates the pilot saw the terrain too late to recover.
This pilot did not have the benefit of a co-pilot (as required by European Regulators for the operation of this helicopter) to spread the workload. He had VIP passengers who needed to get to their afternoon game. Canceling or diverting for weather would have been a hard decision.
Too often helicopter pilots are pressured to complete their flights in dangerous and low-level conditions. Airline Operations manuals have weather minimums defined in black and white to help prevent such pressure (which is why you’ll see some airlines operating and others canceling flights from the same poor weather airport). However, it is unlikely that in the under-regulated world (Part 91 Commercial Ops) that this helicopter operated such corporate guidelines existed. Indeed, 11 years ago, the Catalina operator was involved in another accident that killed 3 people due to faulty maintenance.
The result is a crash that should never have happened. We join the world in expressing our sadness for this tragedy and for the families of the nine victims.
The day after Christmas was marred by the third commercial helicopter crash in Hawaii this year. Following a day-long search for the Safari Helicopter operated tour, the crash site was found with the remains of the 7 perished occupants.
These crashes in addition to the skydiving crash which killed 11 people in June make 2019 of the worst years for aviation accidents in Hawaiian history.
Hawaii is a unique and challenging place to aviate. While the cause of the crash is to be determined, the unforgiving terrain of Kauai would have left the pilot without a safe option if the aircraft had mechanical problems.
Air tour operators often run on very limited margins. We at Aviation Law Group have seen cases where the accidents were the results of scenic tour operators under training their pilots and under maintaining their fleets.
After Robert Hedrick passed the Hawaiian bar in 2015, Aviation Law Group became the only aviation accident firm with attorneys that are licensed in the State of Hawaii.
If you have a loved one who was injured in this or any other Hawaiian air accident, we are here to help.
(L-R J.J. Camp QC, Associate Counsel, CFM Lawyers, Canada, Micheál P O’Higgins SC, Chairman Council of The Bar of Ireland, Ireland, Sigrid Preissl, Managing Partner, Bourayne & Preissl, France, Robert F. Hedrick, Attorney, Aviation Law Group PS, Seattle, Niamh Hodnett, Solicitor, Commission for Communications (ComReg), Gerard Forlin QC, Cornerstone Barristers, UK)
ALG attorney Robert Hedrick was invited by the Bar of Ireland and Law Society of Ireland (Barristers) to speak in Dublin about jury trials in the U.S. He was part of a panel of international trial lawyers conducting a program entitled: Does The Law Ensure Fair Civil Trials? An International Panel Perspective On Upholding the Rule of Law. As reported in the Bar of Ireland news:
In line with this theme, legal professionals from across the world came together in Dublin to share international perspectives on fair civil trials. Judges versus juries, the role of government investigations in civil trials, recoverable damages, and time to trial and cost were amongst the topics discussed in a panel discussion moderated by Robert F. Hedrick, an attorney with Aviation Law Group PS in Seattle and Niamh Hodnett, a solicitor with the Commission for Communications Regulation (ComReg).
Micheál P O’Higgins SC, Chairman Council of The Bar of Ireland, said: “It is an honour to welcome legal professionals from the UK, Canada, France and the US to exchange ideas and best practise on fair civil trials. While civil trials vary greatly across jurisdictions, it is crucial to ensure there is fairness across the board for those involved in the legal system, whether defendants, plaintiffs, or others.”
“As legal professionals this is an issue of great importance to us as we consider ourselves to be defenders of the rule of law by acting against unlawful situations and defending citizens’ rights. We are delighted to team with our international peers to mark this occasion.
The busiest traveling weekend of the year was marred by multiple general aviation accidents across the county. The worst of involved a Pilatus PC-12 that crashed shortly after takeoff from Chamberlain Municipal Airport (9V9) which 9 of the 12 people on board the aircraft.
The NTSB has begun an investigation into the cause of the accident. A preliminary report on the plane crash should be released in about a week.
At the time of the departure, the area was under a winter storm warning with visibility a half of a mile at the airport. While a PC-12 is equipped with de-icing boots, it has no ability to remove ice from the surface of the wings and 9V9 was not equipped with deicing equipment.
The victims of the accident were returning to their home in Idaho Falls, Idaho from an annual hunting trip. Our hearts go out to the who family is now preparing for the funerals of four generations of men who perished in the crash.
On October 30, 2019 Robert Hedrick gave a PowerPoint presentation to the Air Law Section of the Canadian Bar Association in Vancouver, British Columbia, on: Drone Technology For Helicopters And Beyond: The Legal Landscape.
Robert discussed new drone technology that is being incorporated into helicopter load stabilization, and how civilian and military markets throughout the world are anxious to implement this technology to increase safety and save lives. This state-of-the-art technology involves connecting a drone type device to helicopter external loads to prevent swinging and spinning. The future use of this technology includes use on high rise construction cranes, off-shore oil platforms, and for firefighting.
Robert also addressed the legal status of this technology and the current framework of Federal Aviation Regulations related to operations involving this state-of-the-art technology. He also discussed safety issues and accident liability.
A PenAir codeshare flight for Alaska Airlines overran the runway at Unalaska, AK (USA) with 38 passengers and 3 crew. The aircraft came to a stop about 125 meters/400 feet past the end of the runway partially hanging down a slope into the sea, the left-hand propeller blades had contacted some obstacles, blades impacted and penetrated the fuselage.
One passenger died as a result of the accident, two passengers received serious injuries, five received minor injuries. One injured passenger was flown out to Anchorage. A total of eleven passengers were taken to a hospital. This tragedy ends a six-year period time without a fatality on US soil from an Airline accident.
Preliminary investigations show that the pilot landed with a gusting tailwind on a slippery runway. This was a recipe for disaster and one that should have been prevented.
Our sympathies go to the victim of accident many of whom were en route to start their fishing season in Alaska and now must deal with painful rehabilitation from this accident.
As the only aviation accident firm with lawyers licensed in both Alaska and Washington we can assist in finding justice for those injured in this tragedy.
On May 18, 2016 AGL attorney Robert Hedrick gave a PowerPoint presentation to Scotland’s Faculty of Advocates, in Edinburgh, Scotland. Below is an article from the Scottish Legal News publication, which can also be viewed at:
Members and guests of theFaculty of Advocates have been given a fascinating glimpse of the historic Nuremberg Trials and the widely-debated cross-examination of Hermann Goering.
Robert Hedrick, a US attorney and an Adjunct Professor at Seattle University, is an avid student of the Trials and has delivered a PowerPoint presentation, From History’s Greatest Trial: The Cross-Examination of Hermann Goering, to audiences in the US and Australia.
He took time out from a conference in Edinburgh on international aviation law and insurance to give his talk to the Faculty.
Mr Hedrick said that some people believed the O. J. Simpson case was the trial of the century but he was clear that the description belonged “hands down” to Nuremberg.
“We had the most significant Nazi who survived the War, Hermann Goering, and more than 20 others…it brought out some great performances and some not-so-great performances by the lawyers involved,” he said.
The US Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was the lead prosecutor for the US, and his cross-examination of Goering lasted two-and-a-half days, and was followed by another half day by David Maxwell Fyfe, of Britain’s prosecution team.
Mr Hedrick said Goering was a “slippery” witness, who often complained about the translation of questions to buy time to think of an answer.
“Right from the very beginning, Jackson did not control his witness, and the questions went on and on. Jackson seems more interested in the next question he is going to ask than listening to his witness,” suggested Mr Hedrick.
“Maxwell Fyfe had the benefit of watching Goering and Jackson fight it out for two-and-a-half days, and his number one thing was to control the witness…’This witness is not getting out of my grasp.’ He did a really good job.”
Robert Hedrick was invited to present at the 9th Annual Conference On International Aviation Law and Insurance, held in Edinburgh, Scotland in May, 2016. Mr. Hedrick was on a panel discussing international air carrier liability with other leading industry experts from the U.K., Italy and Australia. The panel was expertly moderated by Alan Reitzfeld of Holland & Knight, New York.
Hedrick gave an update as to the status of international uniformity under the Montreal Convention. He identified areas where the Convention was lacking uniformity, such as under Article 17, where court’s around the world continue to struggle with concepts of strict air carrier liability and emotional distress claims. The panel also discussed the viability of pre-impact fear in wrongful death claims subject to the Convention. He summed up the experience: “It was an honor to be part of this distinguished panel, and to be among colleagues from around the world who, like myself, have a passion for international aviation law.”